The Kindle Fire has showcased that a product well differentiated with
a strong user experience running Android has the potential to challenge
the iPad’s shipment numbers. However, Amazon had to create a unique
Amazon controlled version of Android to make the Fire approach its
potential. Google may not do what is necessary to achieve a similar
result.
Out from Apple’s shadow
Google appears as a company that has lost its way. They started out
with the goal of making the world’s information available to everyone.
They have since wandered off to doing everything from operating systems,
to self-driving cars, to alternative energy products.
Steve Jobs, before he passed, even commented that the firm was being
known for its lack of focus and its tendency to bring out junk as a
result.
When Apple wanted to bring out the iPod, the product that redefined
that company, they didn’t copy anyone else and the end result was a line
of products that positively define the company. Android was Google’s
attempt to copy Apple first with the Nexus Phone and now with the Nexus
tablet. The phone never approached the iPhone in terms of success and
the tablet will likely end up the same. No firm, including Google, can
become better at what another firm, like Apple, is expert at unless
Apple badly stumbles, which appears unlikely at this point. But even if
they were successful, all they would be is a clone of that earlier
effort.
In the end, all Google is doing is trying to be a better Apple, which
wasn’t their initial goal and the effort just suggests they can’t
innovate themselves anymore.
The quintessential Google tablet
So if it’s not a clone of the iPad, what could Google do instead that
would better define an effort representative of them? Google is about
providing the world’s information to anyone, anytime and anywhere. Why
not, instead of focusing on a device that, at its core, is about playing
music and videos, design a device that was optimized for information
capture and discovery? Make the Google tablet great at capturing and
indexing moments and in learning about its user so that it can offer up
content kind of like Amazon and Netflix offer up stuff based on what
you’ve purchased or watched before.
Tie the experience back into a social network so that the training
and activity by one user can be, with permission, spread to other users
making the entire eco-system grow synergistically in both power and
accuracy and you could have something that could both be uniquely
Google’s and it might even have the potential to overshadow the iPad. In
the end, though, Google should be focusing more on finding a way to
build products that accentuate its strengths rather than Apple’s and
build a future that isn’t stolen from someone else.
Beating the iPad?
In the end, I actually think this is a bad question because Google
and Apple are fundamentally different companies. Rather than beating
Apple or Microsoft, for that matter, Google should still be focused on
becoming a better Google. Keeping that in mind I think they could build a
personal technology product that could eventually overshadow Apple, I
just don’t think they get there by first copying the other company.
Rob Enderle in Business Products on December 21
No comments:
Post a Comment